ABOUT RESISTOR JOURNAL

RESISTOR Journal is a journal published by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia, with P-ISSN 2598-7542 and E-ISSN 2598-9650. The RESISTOR journal is first published in October 2017 and has a publishing period twice in a year, namely in April and October. All articles in the RESISTOR Journal will be processed by the editor through the Online Journal System (OJS), and the author can monitor the entire process in the member area. Articles published in RESISTOR Journal, both in hard and soft copy, are available as open access for educational, research and library purposes, and beyond that purpose, the editorial board of RESISTOR Journal is not responsible for copyright infringement.

 

HISTORY JOURNAL

The diversity of branches of science in computer technology certainly requires a forum to accommodate studies and research that emerge from these disciplines. STMIK STIKOM Indonesia currently has a Computer Systems or Computer Systems Engineering department in English called Computer System Engineering. This discipline is of course related to the process called engineering. Engineering is the application of science and technology to solve human problems. In this case computer system engineering, involves hardware and software to solve problems faced around. Surely, by focusing on specific scope, making the quality of research better and directed.

Selection of the word Resistor as the name of the journal is the result of discussions with computer system lecturers. As we know that resistors are one of the important electronic components in regulating and dividing electric current. As electricity is divided, such research results must also be shared and published to get input feedback and further increase the diversity of research that leads to improving the quality of the results of the computer system products being produced.

Based on a very high desire to improve the quality of research works by students and lecturers, the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia Computer System Study Program publishes a journal with the name of the Journal of Computer System Engineering or RESISTOR. The first publication of this journal was on April 21, 2018, took the momentum of Kartini's day, which the most well-known note, that is, From Darkness to Light. Hopefully this journal can contribute continuously in increasing the development of science and technology.

 

FOCUS AND SCOPE

Focus and scope of RESISTOR Journal includes: (a) Communications, (b) Networking and  Broadcasting Power, (c) Energy, and Industry Applications, (d) Signal Processing and Analysis, (e) Computing and Processing, (f) Robotics and Control, (g) Internet of Things, (h) Machine Learning, (i) Network and System Security, (j) Wireless Sensor Network, (k) Mobile Ad-hoc Network, dan (l) Digital Forensics.

 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

The author's copyright in the RESISTOR Journal, assigns that the publication of published articles is owned by the editorial board with the author's approval, but the rights are still with the author. The legal rules for accessing digital electronic articles are under license  Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that the RESISTOR Journal has the right to store, modify, manage databases, maintain and publish articles without the author's permission, but the author as the copyright holder is still written as it is. Articles published in RESISTOR Journals, both in hard and soft copy forms are available as open access, for educational, research and library purposes, and beyond that purpose, the editorial board of the Language and Language Journal is not responsible for illegal copyright infringement. This journal also applies LOCKSS and CLOKSS archiving.

 

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Jurnal RESISTOR focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Plagiarismcheckerx.

The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.

The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

Section A: Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.