ANALISIS TANDA VISUAL DALAM TAGAR CORONA ART MUSEUM

Authors

  • Nofrizaldi Nofrizaldi Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto
  • Pungky Febi Arifianto STIE Perbanas
  • Elianna Gerda Pertiwi Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31598/bahasarupa.v4i1.614

Keywords:

sign analysis, Visual Communication Design, Instagram, Visual Analysis

Abstract

The gallery is a space of interaction between artists and audiences. In the era of pamdemik covid, gallery space was closed due to physical distancing. Imaginary space is built by utilizing communication and information technology. Instagram as a digital platform is widely used as a space for building artistic interactions. Through the hashtag of Corona Art Museum, the writer looks for some visual works to be used as object of analysis. Verbal and visual signs in the visual content will be dissected using the classification of signs: icons, indexes, symbols from Charles S. Peirce and the system of meaning production of codes using The Five Code: Hermeunetic, Narrative, Cultural, Semantik & Symbolic from Roland Barthes. The reading of visual signs will use the Sumbo Tinarbuko Triadik in looking at aspects of visual communication. The results of reading visual signs will reveal how visual content in an imaginary space can be a space of expression and the existence of an artist / designer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Rondhi, “Fungsi Seni bagi Kehidupan Manusia: Kajian Teoretik,” 2014.

G. M. Morriss-Kay, “The evolution of human artistic creativity,” J. Anat., vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 158–176, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01160.x.

K. Hanny, Desain Grafis Indonesia Dalam Pusaran Dunia. Jakarta: DGI Press, 2015.

R. Arham, “Lini Masa,” Mata Jendela, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 12–15, 2016.

O. D. Salam, “Personal Branding Digital Natives di Era Komunikasi Media Baru (Analisis Personal Branding di Media Sosial Instagram,” J. BECOSS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2020.

S. Tinarbuko, “Semiotika Analisis Tanda Pada Karya Desain Komunikasi Visual,” Nirmana, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2003.

Y. Safanayong, Desain Komunikasi Visual Terpadu. Jakarta: Arte intermedia, 2006.

S. Tinarbuko, Semiotika Komunikasi Visual. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2008.

J. Fiadcara, Communication Design: Principles, Method, And Practice. New York: , Allwort Press, 2004.

I. N. Jayanegara, “Semiotika Visual Logo RSU.Surya Husadha Denpasar,” J. Bhs. Rupa, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–16, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.31598/bahasarupa.v1i1.138.

P. Studi Arsitektur, L. Suminar, B. Setiawan, W. Her Nugrahandika, M. Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah, and G. Mada Yogyakarta Korespondensi, “Pemanfaatan Galeri Seni Sebagai Ruang Publik di Yogyakarta,” 2017, doi: 10.32315/ti.6.e001.

A. Sobur, “Karya Seni sebagai Media,” Mediat. J. Komun., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 211–220, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.29313/mediator.v8i2.1245.

P. F. Arifianto, “SEMIOTIKA TANDA INFOGRAFIS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK),” J. Bhs. Rupa, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–24, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.31598/bahasarupa.v2i1.210.

W. Himawan and B. A. Nugroho, “Visual Tradisi dalam Karya Seni Lukis Kontemporer Sebagai Wujud Artistik Pengaruh Sosial Budaya,” J. Urban Soc. Arts, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–109, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.24821/jousa.v1i2.791.

A. A. Berger, Tanda-Tanda Dalam Kebudayaan Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana, 2000.

R. Barthes, S/Z. New York: Straus and Giroux,Inc, 1973.

S. Tinarbuko, “Semiotika Tanda Verbal dan Tanda Visual Iklan Layanan Masyarakat,” Panggung, vol. 26, no. 2, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.26742/panggung.v26i2.175.

Y. A. Piliang, Hiper-semiotika: Tafsir Cultural Studies Atas Matinya Makna. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-28

How to Cite

[1]
N. Nofrizaldi, P. F. Arifianto, and E. G. Pertiwi, “ANALISIS TANDA VISUAL DALAM TAGAR CORONA ART MUSEUM”, bahasarupa, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42-49, Oct. 2020.